The preview

The draft announced an introductory webinar on Power Automate for people seeking to understand automated workflows. The programme focused on recurring tasks, notifications and approvals but did not provide a confirmed event date.

What this means for the organisation

A good start is a stable process with a clear trigger, owner and intended outcome. Exceptions should be mapped before automation. The flow can then be tested with representative data and monitored for failures and unnecessary runs.

The draft announced an introductory Power Automate session using recurring tasks, notifications and approvals as examples. It provided no reliable event date, so the text records the series plan rather than a completed event. Its professional starting point is still concrete: a stable trigger, a defined outcome and known exceptions.

Microsoft’s 2016 Flow launch records the product’s original role in connecting services, data and automated actions. It explains the platform background, while the webinar shows a later, concrete approval flow. The product source describes the capability; the recording shows selected rules, data and a human decision in one example.

A production approval flow needs ownership of thresholds, recipient groups and error handling. Testing should include missing customer data, rejection, absence and parallel responses. Run history can then reveal whether a case stopped during retrieval, routing or human review, and whether the rule needs changing.

Sources

Primary source: ProsessPilotene, “Neste webinar,” 1 January 2025 (Norwegian).

Microsoft, “Announcing Microsoft Flow General Availability,” 31 October 2016.

Join the discussion

Which experience from your own organisation is most relevant to this story? Share what you learned.