Created with AI.
Choosing a CRM will tie you to it for many years. This guide outlines an evaluation process that can be completed in four weeks and provides a sound basis for a decision you can stand behind.
Be specific and measurable. “We want to know how many quotes are outstanding” works. “Better customer follow-up” does not. This is the list you will use to evaluate the vendors.
Not as it should be. This usually reveals that practices vary from person to person, and that variation must be addressed regardless of which system you choose.
Where is the customer data currently stored, how much of it is there, and what is its quality? This affects both cost and timeline more than the choice of system.
Must have, should have, can wait. Without prioritization, all requirements become equally important, and then the supplier who says yes to the most wins—not the one who is the best fit.
“We need to be able to see all open quotes for a single customer” is a requirement. “We need a quote module with a dashboard” is a proposed solution that rules out good alternatives.
Not a standard demo. Give the vendor three specific scenarios from your day-to-day operations and ask them to demonstrate those exact scenarios. The differences between vendors will become immediately apparent.
Licensing, implementation, integration, and management. The cheapest license is rarely the most cost-effective solution.
Is the necessary expertise available in-house or in your local market? A system that no one knows how to use will be expensive, no matter how good a fit it seemed on paper.
Write down what you chose and why, measured against the list from week 1. In two years, the question will come up, and this document will be the answer.
Ask a question or share what helped you.

Marketing | Article
Microsoft published release wave 2 plans on 16 July after Dynamics 365 Contact Center became generally available and Customer Insights gained a new Optimizely connection. July provided actual deliveries alongside a roadmap for October through March.

Marketing | Article
Microsoft published its April-to-September Dynamics 365 and Power Platform plans on 25 January. The plan gives managers a basis for testing, but describes scheduled deliveries and should not be read as a list of capabilities that were already available.

Customer Service | Article
WEM MCP tools enabled time-off requests, shift swaps and shift bids in Service Agent. Administrators could enable each tool for a role, team or pilot group.

Automation | Article
Microsoft replaced twice-yearly release waves with continuous roadmap publication. Customer processes needed to track status from development through rollout to launch.

Customer Service | Article
Service Agent became generally available across Dynamics 365 and Microsoft 365. Workforce Engagement Management connected demand, staffing and quality work.

Sales | Article
Gartner found nearly five hours saved per seller each week, but many organisations did not reinvest the time. Dynamics wave 1 described connections across customer insight, sales, service and field work.
Do you have a question or experience to share?
Be the first to contribute.