A user story describes a need from the end user's perspective, using simple, non-technical language. Use this approach when describing a new feature in DevOps so that the team understands why they are building it, what they are building, and the value it creates.
Establish who has the need, what the need is, and why the need exists.
Write the story as “As a … I want … so that …”, for example, “As a user, I want to submit my application digitally so that it can be processed quickly.”
It is normally the product owner's role to write the user story. If the product owner does not have sufficient insight to do so herself, she is nevertheless responsible for ensuring that someone else completes it.
Break the user story down into acceptance criteria that describe what is required for the story to be accepted as delivered.
Write each criterion so that it can be clearly determined whether it has been met. Feel free to combine functional and quality requirements where relevant.
Use the acceptance criteria as the basis for test tasks and test criteria, so that the developer and tester know exactly what needs to be created and tested.
Use an abbreviated version of the user story as the title, and set the status to whatever the team has agreed should apply when the story is considered “ready”.
Paste the user story into the Description field and the acceptance criteria into the Acceptance Criteria field.
Document the collaboration in the discussion section: ask questions and capture comments as the story develops.
Ask a question or share what helped you.

Automation | Article
OpenAI’s Data agent could investigate company data and build shareable interactive dashboards. Access controls and source trails needed to follow analysis and action through the workflow.

Project management | Event
DynUG brought the Dynamics 365, Power Platform and Fabric communities together in Oslo.

Automation | Article
Power BI reports and semantic models became grounding in Copilot Chat and Cowork. Shared chats, synced notebooks and Planner status connected analysis with collaboration.

Project management | Article
Copilot Notebooks and Cowork gained more ways to share project context. Agent metrics and cost controls expanded in the admin centre.

Automation | Article
Copilot administrators gained central controls for consumption-based cost. Purview controls extended to Cowork, and agent metrics could connect with organisational context.

Project management | Article
Federated connectors could retrieve live SaaS data through MCP. Copilot Notebooks gathered project context while Word and Teams gained collaboration features.
Do you have a question or experience to share?
Be the first to contribute.