The retrospective takes place after the sprint review and before the next sprint planning session, and is the team’s regular opportunity to improve how it works. Use this approach after each sprint and at the end of the project to capture lessons learned from the entire project.
Schedule the retrospective after the sprint review and before planning the next sprint, so that responsibility rests with the project manager.
Adjust the meeting length to the duration of the sprint: typically 45 minutes for a one-week sprint, 1.5 hours for two weeks, 2.25 hours for three weeks, and 3 hours for one month.
Use the Retrospective extension in DevOps as a support tool to gather input from the team before and during the meeting.
Establish the goals for the meeting in advance—for example, improving stand-ups, communication with stakeholders, or operating rules.
Draw on everyone's experience and perspective from the sprint to create a shared pool of information.
Identify useful patterns in the information collected, and always ask why things happened the way they did.
Identify the problems and challenges the team needs to address, and create a concrete plan for how they can successfully tackle each one.
Summarize the meeting, thank the participants, and consider how future retrospectives can be improved.
Have each team member identify what went well during the sprint and what did not go according to plan—without looking for someone to blame.
Discuss what the team learned during the sprint that could improve the way they work.
Check whether the definition of “done” is still appropriate for the team, or whether it should be tightened as the team gains more experience.
At the end of the project, the knowledge gained by the project group is shared with all of ProsessPilotene as part of the final report.
Ask a question or share what helped you.

Automation | Article
OpenAI’s Data agent could investigate company data and build shareable interactive dashboards. Access controls and source trails needed to follow analysis and action through the workflow.

Project management | Event
DynUG brought the Dynamics 365, Power Platform and Fabric communities together in Oslo.

Automation | Article
Power BI reports and semantic models became grounding in Copilot Chat and Cowork. Shared chats, synced notebooks and Planner status connected analysis with collaboration.

Project management | Article
Copilot Notebooks and Cowork gained more ways to share project context. Agent metrics and cost controls expanded in the admin centre.

Automation | Article
Copilot administrators gained central controls for consumption-based cost. Purview controls extended to Cowork, and agent metrics could connect with organisational context.

Project management | Article
Federated connectors could retrieve live SaaS data through MCP. Copilot Notebooks gathered project context while Word and Teams gained collaboration features.
Do you have a question or experience to share?
Be the first to contribute.